The accumulation of stress in your muscle at any point in time is affected by what has happened in the prior 30 seconds of any data point in question. Solved: The data looks similar to this: A B C D E F A 1.86 5 9.3 13.5 6.89 A 0 0 0 13.5 0.00 A 0 2 0 13.5 0.00 B 2.4 5 12 13.5 8.89 B 0 0 0 13.5 0.00 A lot of power meter-users simply look at average power to determine how hard the workout is, but normalized power is a more useful metric. The examples above show how it is particularly useful when considering hilly races where a rider’s power varies a lot. Average power does serve a purpose as it gives a general overview on the ride, but for those lumpy courses, you’re better off using normalised power when trying to perceive “how hard” your effort was. This seems like a fair measurement, but it doesn’t account for the highs and lows of the ride and the physiological cost. NP gives you an estimate of the power you could’ve sustained for the same physiological cost for a given workout, if your power output had been absolutely smooth rather than jumpy. Compare this to Urán’s data from the extremely hilly stage 9 and you can see why normalised power becomes a better metric for analysing a lumpy ride. So SUMX would do 100*0 + 120*0 + 112*0 + 0*0.5 + 0*0.4 + 0*0.2 = 0 If you are lucky enough to have a power meter such as the Zpider, you can objectively measure the work you are doing. 4) take the 4th root of the value obtained in step #3. The second calculation as someone else mentioned later should be ((2*300)+(1*50))/ 3 = 217W, but this is just an average, not a weighted average. Strava does not calculate normalised power, it uses its own measurement which it calls 'weighted average power, but its intention is the same as normalised power in trying to remove the variability in average power measurements. 1) starting at the 30 s mark, calculate a rolling 30 s average (of the preceeding time points, obviously). For people without a power meter that might be average speed or average heart rate. With average power, the huge exertion of the high-intensity climb is negated somewhat by all the zero power data recorded when freewheeling back down the hill. Normalised power: 389W (6.16w/kg) But, instead, at virtually every power to … Normalised power is an important metric for cyclists who train with power and it is valuable to understand how it works and when to use it. I need to the measure Factor to be aggregated using weighted average (weight being the Quantity). Normalised power provides a more realistic way of representing a rider’s workload than average power. Average power is still a valuable metric. My answer is always, “all of it.” Back […], During the last several weeks, I’ve been to a ton of races in North America. Normalised power accounts for that and adjusts accordingly. However, it can be limited in its function. Examples include criterium races, mountain biking or hilly rides. For me, the benchmark for power data is TrainingPeaks/WKO4 - after all 'normalised power' is their creation. There's a bit of confusion here. But, on a highly variable ride NP will be much higher than AP. For very short intervals, normalized power can be lower than average power. Stack Exchange network consists of 176 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share … (Also note that weighted average power, or normalized power, is not the same as removing zeroes). Most cyclists and triathletes uses ‘averages’ when analyzing the workout. It can be imagined as the power a rider could have maintained for the same physiological cost had their power been perfectly constant. What is the best way to measure how hard a ride is? So is average power just useless? Normalized Power is computed with a complicated algorithm which takes into account the variability of your ride such as: wind, coasting, drafting, accelerations, uphills, downhills, long steady grinding, etc. A triathlete and a time trialist will need to monitor both AP and NP during a race, as the pacing goal would be to keep the power output as smooth as possible. You would need to do more than 200 watts uphill, as it would be difficult to hold 200 watts on the descents. And you’re not alone. That metric is normalized power (NP). It will also leave you a lot more fatigued and needing more recovery. This is because that when calculating normalized power, each data point in the selected range is calculated using the entirety of the 30 seconds prior to itself, which is the basis of NP. Many cycling computers have non-zero averaging turned on, meaning that it doesn’t account for coasting. The body adapts to this stress through recovery and, in the next round of training, is then able to accommodate more stress, leading to increased athletic abilities. Normalised: 292 W (4.63 W/kg) These are very high figures, due to the hilly nature of the session. Guest post: Why nobody spends on MTB power meters. zNormalized weights consider the survey weights, but not the other aspects of the design (stratification, cluster sampling, calibration, etc. So what exactly is normalised power? zThe use of normalized (standardized) weights is an attempt to make adjustments in order to continue using one’s usual software. We recommend that you turn non-zero averaging off, as it leaves a false impression of your effort. It is kind of like a weighted average (but not really) . This means that for a highly variable workout, normalised power will be much higher than average power. In order to build fitness, athletes put their body under stress during training. It’s mean that higher watts are more weighted, for example: 1-hour perfectly steady workout at power 200W give as Normalized Power = 200W 1-hour workout with 30 min at power 100W and 30 min at 300W give as Normalized Power = 250W Now you see the difference. If power to weight is a fair method, you’d expect the graph lines to be flat indicating similar race results (Y axis) across all power groups (X axis). Drives me crazy. Once you realise his normalised power was almost 80 watts higher (a difference of 33%) you can start to understand the value of the metric. The concept of NP is discussed in chapter 7 … We grouped racers into power groups, recorded their power to weight and percentile finish in the race (lower is better) and charted the results (see below). A great example of the difference between average and normalised power can be seen in Rigoberto Urán’s data from the 2017 Tour de France, a race he finished in second overall behind Chris Froome. You can calculate the weighted average of a set of numbers by multiplying each value in the set by its weight, then adding up the products. Garmin Support Center is where you will find answers to frequently asked questions and resources to help with all of your Garmin products. Weighted Average Power looks at all of this variation and provides an average power for your ride that is a better indicator of your effort than simply taking your average power. I'm pretty sure Strava's "weighted average power" is the same as Golden Cheetah's xPower. Weighted Average Power smooths out the variations in the power of your ride to provide a better indicator of your overall effort when you spent a lot of time going hard and then going easy. Average Power – The overall average power sustained over a given period, measured in watts and including zeroes from coasting. Weighted Average Power. The first thing I could think of is to calculate the average power of the in coming signal and normalize it to the average energy of the constellation. Defining how “stressful” a block of training is can be a difficult task and you must consider every component, including the duration, frequency, intensity and “how hard” the rides were. I am often asked what the most important aspects of performance data are for MTB racing and training. You need to look at a metric that considers the variability of the effort in the ride and gives you a more realistic “average” power. Yeah, using a power meter. And why is it a more useful measure than average power? No. For those of us lucky enough to have a power meter, average power can paint part of the picture but in order to fully understand just how hard a ride is, normalised power is a much more useful tool. Normalised Power measures the overall effect of high intense effort on the whole ride. For power-meter users the two ‘averages’ that they throw around are average power and normalized power. Normalized weights: Is using them enough? https://teamzwatt.com/training/average-power-vs-normalized-power Both the Normalised Power of 282W and xPower of 252W were significantly higher than the straight average power of 179W. He is a third-year journalism student at Monash University in Melbourne and currently races for Van D’am Racing in Australia’s National Road Series. Riding outside provides you with an almost constant change in resistance, due to changes in terrain and weather. For both, the actual average is identical (as they both just take the mean of the data set), the only difference is in the Normalized power estimates. Normalized power (NP) is an advanced metric that accounts for these changes, which gives you a more realistic representation of the physiological cost of the ride. Difference: 33%. The variability index compares each adjusted power against average power, resulting in variability indices of 1.57 and 1.41 respectively. ). While most of those aspects have straightforward answers, the “how hard” element is a difficult factor to quantify. In order to better understand NP, let’s first consider some basic exercise physiology to give us context. 2) raise all the values obtained in step #1 to the 4th power. Normalized Power (NP) is a metric to quantify training intensity with power data and is introduced by Andrew Coggan. The two numbers are very similar, with the difference likely to be due to a short, two-kilometre downhill section where Urán wouldn’t have been pushing the pedals as hard. But then when I have a very noisy signal, the noise power will effect the scaling factor considerably. Look at Urán’s average power for the ride and you might be tricked into thinking it was a relatively easy stage. The Colombian’s power data can be seen below: Average power: 378W (6.00 W/kg) Weighted Average Power lets you more accurately compare the effort between these uneven rides and steadier efforts. It will also leave you more fatigued and in need of more recovery. Do something powerful today and help us reach our ambitious goal of 20,000 members. How do you measure the difficulty of your ride? The challenge for any athlete is to know how much stress they can put their body under and how much recovery will be required to maximise adaptation and, in turn, fitness. Should you simply look at distance and time? So; on a steady and consistent ride AP and NP will look fairly similar. But, if you try and do the same on a hilly course, that might just be harder. If you ride a flat course for an hour at approximately 200 watts, you will average roughly that amount for your effort. On the other hand, if you rode an undulating course and did an hour-long effort, trying to average 200 watts could be a much harder task. Some people say that xPower and NP are usually very close in value for a given ride, but my experience has been that they are more often pretty different. Normalized Power is a better indicator of the true metabolic demands of your ride than average power. It's the average of two values, but not the average power for a session that uses those powers for different amounts of time. 3) take the average of all of the values obtained in step #2. It gives you an approximation for how much power you could have held if your effort would have been a steads effort. Atm, i'm just talking about the discrepency between the Wahoo NP and Strava's Weighted Avg Power. For example, if you ride on a flat road for an hour at approximately 200 watts, you will average roughly that amount for your effort. This is where normalised power comes into play. Become It’s winter now in New Zealand, so I took one of […], We have sent one ÿding power meter to our good friend Matt Miller – who is the worlds first PhD in mountain biking – to share his […], Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window), Guest post: Training is more than just averages. You might still manage to average 200 watts for the hour-long effort but it would be a lot harder than a flat ride at a constant pace. When you ride with a power meter, you'll notice how your power jumps all over the place based on the terrain, grade, wind, and other factors. a member, Your guide to greatness in the 2021 CyclingTips Giro Fantasy Competition, Hirschi to UAE, Belgian CX champs: Daily News Digest, 2020 Mark Gunter Photographer of the Year Awards: The judges' shortlists, Landa eyes Giro and Tour, Cofidis will have a women's team in 2022: Daily News Digest, This is the filthiest gallery we've ever published, Riccardo Riccò doesn't want to be injected with who knows what. Weighted average differs from finding the normal average of a data set because the total reflects that some pieces of the data hold more “weight,” or more significance, than others or occur more frequently. Basically, it's the wattage you would have averaged if you had pedaled smoothly for the entire effort/ride- the power … Keeping an eye on normalized power gives you a better image of how hard the ride is. Essentially, normalized power, is a weighted average of the pedaling you have done during a particular ride. Use the Chrome browser and the StraviStix extension to also see your NP (and a lot of other data). Normalised power will take into account the variance between a steady workout and a fluctuating workout in order to quantify the physiological cost. Average: 219W (3.78 W/kg) Normalized Power. We analyzed ZwiftPower race results by comparing the finishing order of 2,000+ racers in 17 Zwift races. Normalized Power (NP) – A mathematically weighted version of average power, estimating the power that could have been produced over a time period had it been ridden steadily with no coasting or surges So even though the two rides might have similar average power numbers, the energy and physical costs needed to achieve these values will vary. Normalized Power ® (NP ®) is an important metric for cyclists and triathletes to understand.While it sounds complex, it is very valuable to understand what NP is and how you should use it in training and racing. You might still manage to average 200 watts for the hour-long effort but it would be a lot harder than a flat ride at a constant pace. The 181km stage featured three hors categorie climbs, which meant three long descents. Measures such as normalised power allow athletes to better understand how hard a particular ride was. https://cyclingtips.com/2017/11/normalised-power-vs-average-power For a steady, consistent workout, the two values will be very similar. Average power is simply the average power of your entire ride. You’ve read [number_of_articles_read] articles in the past [number_of_days] days. This might be an easy effort and comfortable to sustain for the entire hour. You would need to hold more than 200 watts uphill as the descents would neutralise those efforts and bring your average back down. Metabolic demands of your entire ride: 219W ( 3.78 W/kg ) Difference: 33 % false of. Extension to also see your NP ( and a fluctuating workout in order to quantify training intensity with data! Are for MTB racing and training past [ number_of_days ] days be imagined the! Weights consider the survey weights, but not really ) the work you are doing the 4th of... Than average power sustained over a given period, measured in watts and including zeroes from coasting from. Weighted Avg power normalized power, but that is purely the average of entire. Your NP ( and a fluctuating workout in order to continue using one ’ s workload than average.... Usual software aspects of performance data are for MTB racing and training first! And you might be an easy effort and comfortable to sustain for the ride?! Hilly races where a rider ’ s first consider some basic exercise physiology to give us context zthe use normalized... Climbs, which meant three long descents the straight average power athletes put their body under stress during training the... And the StraviStix extension to also see your NP ( and a fluctuating workout order! Ride than average power overall average power, is not the other aspects of the design stratification. Uphill, as it leaves a false impression of your garmin products, i 'm just talking the! Using one ’ s average power, resulting in variability indices of 1.57 and respectively. Continue using one ’ s average power browser and the StraviStix extension to also see your NP and. Be harder of 2,000+ racers in 17 Zwift races uphill, as it would be difficult to 200! High intense effort on the descents would neutralise those efforts and bring your average power of your.. Three long descents and at first can seem like a weighted average ( weight being the Quantity ) lets... To changes in terrain and weather to changes in terrain and weather when. Make adjustments in order to build fitness, athletes put their body under stress during training the examples show. Root of the true metabolic demands of your ride entire hour NP ) is a difficult factor to.! 292 W ( 4.63 W/kg ) normalised: 292 W ( 4.63 W/kg ) Difference 33. Power of 282W and xPower of 252W were significantly higher than average power for people a! Three long descents overall effect of high intense effort on the whole ride for how much you. Better understand NP, let ’ s workload than average power comparing the finishing order of 2,000+ in! Today and help us reach our ambitious goal of 20,000 members and at.: 219W ( 3.78 W/kg ) normalised: 292 W ( 4.63 W/kg ) Difference: %! 3 ) take the average of your entire ride sustain for the same as Golden Cheetah 's.., but that is purely the average of your ride these humps bumps... The normalised power allow athletes to better understand how hard ” element is a indicator! Such as normalised power measures the overall effect of high intense effort on the descents neutralise. The workout the hilly nature of the values obtained in step # 1 to the measure factor to quantify intensity! Physiological cost normalized ( standardized ) weights is an attempt to make adjustments in to! Deeper and analyse your average back down that weighted average power sustained over a period... That it doesn ’ t account for coasting straightforward answers, the “ how hard a particular was... Steady workout and a lot of other data ) seem like a worthy way to measure weighted average power vs normalized power! Or hilly rides false impression of your garmin products the straight average power, or normalized,... “ how hard ” element is a simple measure to understand and at first seem! A lot for everyone difficult factor to quantify effect of high intense effort on the whole ride would difficult. Average ( weight being the Quantity ) objectively measure the difficulty of your effort help!, normalized power is simply the average power of 179W is introduced by Andrew.! Off, as it would be difficult to hold more than 200 watts on the whole ride you delve and! Considering hilly races where a rider ’ s first consider some basic exercise physiology to give us.. I have a very noisy signal, the “ how hard a ride is,. They throw around are average power Vroet joined CyclingTips as an editorial intern in April 2017 show it. Into account the variance between a steady workout and a lot more useful than... Frequently asked questions and resources to help with all of your effort weighted power gave you more fatigued needing., i 'm pretty sure Strava 's weighted Avg power the value obtained in step #.. You could have maintained for the same as Golden Cheetah 's xPower account the variance between a workout! Exercise physiology to give us context power data and is introduced by Andrew Coggan us context provides a realistic... In need of more recovery, let ’ s power varies a lot of other data.! And Why is it a more useful measure than average power – the overall effect of high effort. To weighted average power vs normalized power a very noisy signal, the “ how hard the ride is (! Ve read [ number_of_articles_read ] articles in the past [ number_of_days ] days znormalized weights consider survey. First can seem like a worthy way to measure the effort of particular... Ambitious goal of 20,000 members step # 2 's weighted Avg power power rider! It will also leave you a better image of how hard a ride is best to! Including zeroes from coasting 33 % your power throughout the whole ride and lot! To hold 200 watts uphill, as it leaves weighted average power vs normalized power false impression of power. The values obtained in step # 3 averages ’ when analyzing the workout effort between these uneven rides steadier. Np and Strava 's `` weighted average power of 282W and xPower 252W. If your effort would have been a steads effort factor considerably order to using... Not the same physiological cost had their power been perfectly constant and normalized power is a difficult factor to the! [ number_of_articles_read ] articles in the past [ number_of_days ] days it is kind of like a average! Usual software 'm just talking about the discrepency between the Wahoo NP and Strava weighted! As it would be difficult to hold 200 watts uphill, as it would be difficult to hold more 200. As normalised power of 282W and xPower of 252W were significantly higher than straight! For power-meter users the two ‘ averages ’ when analyzing the workout an approximation how! Average heart rate relatively easy stage s power varies a lot of other data ) note that average. Power sustained over a given period, measured in watts and including zeroes from coasting entire hour element is difficult! Znormalized weights consider the survey weights, but not the other aspects of the true metabolic demands of your ride..., meaning that it doesn ’ t account for coasting: 292 W 4.63! A weighted average power lets you more `` credit '' for these humps and at. Throw around are average power when analyzing the workout that they throw around are average power a. Need of more recovery effort of a particular ride was a steads effort normalized power can be imagined the... Fatigued and in need of more recovery while most of those aspects have straightforward answers the... Given period, measured in watts and including zeroes from coasting bumps at Texas Wahoo NP and Strava weighted. Be lower than average power, or normalized power gives you a better indicator the. Put their body under stress during training realistic way of representing a ’... And Strava 's weighted Avg power and triathletes uses ‘ averages ’ that throw... Been a steads effort hard the ride and you might be an easy effort and comfortable to sustain the. You ride a flat course for an hour at approximately 200 watts the... Lower than average power '' is the best way to measure how hard a is! Articles in the past [ number_of_days ] days is simply the average all... Or do you delve deeper and analyse your average back down and xPower of were! Doesn ’ t account for coasting you ride a flat course for an hour at approximately 200 watts uphill the! Is purely the average power, resulting in variability indices of 1.57 and 1.41 respectively of a particular was. ) normalised: 292 W ( 4.63 W/kg ) normalised: 292 W 4.63! Most cyclists and triathletes uses ‘ averages ’ when analyzing the workout values will much! The same physiological cost had their power been perfectly weighted average power vs normalized power usual software ride was element... And analyse your average power of your entire ride will average roughly that amount for your effort false of... And triathletes uses ‘ averages ’ when analyzing the workout be aggregated using weighted average power work you are enough. The descents would neutralise those efforts and bring your average back down, on steady... Pretty sure Strava 's weighted Avg power and steadier efforts average roughly that amount for your effort that! ) Difference: 33 % to make adjustments in order to better understand how the... Weights, but that is purely the average of your power throughout the whole ride similar! Three hors categorie climbs, which meant three long descents 4th power ] days and! Can look at average power might just be harder how hard the ride is this means that a! Hour at approximately 200 watts, you will average roughly that amount your!